|I was watching a documentary about Michael Vick, the former football player who was convicted of running a dog fighting ring, and on the one hand I think truly remorseful people should get second chances. This guy did a bad thing, he went to prison, he's made some positive moves since then. So in that sense, I wasn't mad that he got a second chance in the NFL. I understand why some people were upset about it, but I feel like his recognition of his bad actions made a second chance at least permissible.
However, having a second chance doesn't mean you automatically get your former status back. You don't necessarily get the same influence you used to have, or a platform, or sponsorship deals. You get a second chance at freedom from jail, to operate in a society with laws. Maybe you get some of your old life back. But you don't necessarily get all of it back, no questions asked. People still remember the terrible things you did, and being remorseful about it is good and all, but it doesn't erase the past.
There's this weird underlying belief system, taught by Disney movies or something, where if a person does a horrendous thing but apologizes for it, it's all good. This is patently false. Apologies don't need to be accepted. Also, people generally don't "deserve" a second chance. They might be given one, but it's not a right. #psychology