ddhr.org
Breakfast cookies (4) Wednesday, Dec 7, 2011 4:45 pm

I just bought these Quaker Breakfast Cookies because they have "breakfast" in the product name, which dictates when I'm allowed to eat them.  They're actually pretty good, but my suspicions were accurate:  They're really just straight-up cookies in a package that suggests they can be eaten for breakfast.  Maybe they might have a little more fiber than normal cookies, but other than that, it doesn't change the fact that you're eating cookies for breakfast. 

Betsy Hosier Wednesday, Dec 7, 2011 7:09 pm

I remember when my Dad would finish his breakfast, then he would have an after-breakfast cookie.  He figured that other people ate donuts or muffins for breakfast, so why not cookies!  I think he was on to something there.

Dave Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 9:45 am

I agree that there's really no difference between cookies, donuts, bagels, pancakes, waffles, and any other carbs we typically eat for breakfast.

Rus Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 10:39 am

I beg to differ...psychologically it changes everything!

Dave Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 10:42 am

Yes but psychology won't prevent you from getting fat.

Hello
Hi, my name is Dave Hosier, and this website is where I write my unfounded opinions on trivial matters. Feel free to look around, but please refrain from reading anything.

about | contact | feed

Comments (feed)
Wendy on Tony Romo chokes: Have you seen this article...
Tee on Accents that annoy me: I'm not aylwas identified by...
Dave on Cubeicals wine rack: I ended up cutting a...
Harry on Cubeicals wine rack: So Dave, how did you...
Emily on Constant vs. average speed: I can give you sun...
Dave on Accents that annoy me: I'm pretty much saying I...
Wendy on Accents that annoy me: Are you passively aggressively saying...
JSW on Accents that annoy me: KInda like I can't tell...
Dave on Accents that annoy me: Understood, but my untrained ears...
Dave on Constant vs. average speed: I don't think so.  There...