|
Transformers 2 review
|
Jun 30, 2009
|
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen received some pretty horrible reviews, and before I saw the movie, I couldn't understand why. Were people expecting something other than CGI robot violence and minimal plot? If so, that's their problem. So on Saturday night I defiantly went and saw the movie, where I quickly learned why it received such bad reviews. Sure, it had plenty of robot violence and a brilliant demonstration of American military firepower (which was awesome), but it had several glaring plot and character deficiencies, such as: - Megan Fox. Can we please get over this girl? Sure, she's attractive, but ok, fellow Americans, can we please just get on with our lives? She has a poorly worded prison tattoo for god sakes. I've had enough of her oversexualization and her stupid pouty lips. Give me robots and explosions!
- Skids and Mudflap. These two robots are to Transformers what Jar Jar Binks was to Star Wars.
- No wahnt wahnt wahnt wahnt wahnt. The familiar robotic transformation sound was mysteriously missing.
- Love story. Did I mention that all I'm interested in is gigantic robots, guns, and loud noises involving metal? Why must there be so much lovey-dovey nonsense in a movie about intergalactic robot aliens that magically take the form of common earthly automobiles?
- Spielberg. I didn't realize Steven Spielberg had anything to do with this movie until the closing credits. Then I remembered all the cutesy little anthropomorphic robots who made all the kids and moms in the theater giggle and "aw". Spielberg has a gift for this kind of thing, but I don't think it belongs in a movie about ... have I mentioned recently ... robot violence, guns, and explosions!
In conclusion, Transformers 2 was a decent movie, but I can certainly understand why the critics were so harsh. Regardless, it was entertaining, which is really all I was hoping for from a movie about alien robot violence, destruction, bombs, explosions, guns, firepower, and creaking metal. #entertainment
|
|