|
Damaged politicians (4)
|
Mar 12, 2008
|
|
It seems like we're always looking for political candidates who have a perfect moral record. Never did drugs, never got arrested, never killed a puppy. I think this is stupid. In the event we actually find a candidate who is morally impeccable, it just means they're a good liar. They're good at covering things up. Is that who we want running our country? I'd rather have some dude that said, "Heck yeah I snorted coke. It was great. But that was 30 years ago and I wouldn't do it again because it can easily destroy your whole life and wind up killing you." I'd rather have an honest candidate than some fence-sitter who "smoked pot but didn't inhale". Why smoke pot at all if you don't inhale? It's like drinking without swallowing. #politics
|
Comments:
2008-03-12 13:45:47
I'm with you completely. Back when Clinton got into office I was telling people he was either a bad liar or too dumb to do drugs.
2008-03-12 13:47:11
Back when Clinton was in office, I was 10. Just thought I'd throw that in there.
2008-03-17 13:07:22
Ahhhh yes....throw it out there while you can my friend. Soon you have to go find groups that will roll their eyes when you say such things. :-)
2008-03-18 08:52:46
This guy's got my vote: "Gov. David Paterson, who took over the state's top job Monday after Eliot Spitzer resigned amid a prostitution scandal, has admitted he and his wife Michelle had affairs during a rough patch in their marriage several years ago, a newspaper reported." (Washington Post)
Not to mention the fact that he's blind! Talk about going against the grain...get on with your bad self David Paterson!
|