<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visiting nurses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ddhr.org/2006/06/12/visiting-nurses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ddhr.org/2006/06/12/visiting-nurses/</link>
	<description>The personal web presence of David Hosier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://ddhr.org/2006/06/12/visiting-nurses/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ddhr.org/2006/06/12/visiting-nurses/#comment-556</guid>
		<description>I will agree with Dave, sort of. After much speculation (passing it almost daily) I think the sign means that people in their 90s should insist on having visiting nurses. That makes the most sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will agree with Dave, sort of. After much speculation (passing it almost daily) I think the sign means that people in their 90s should insist on having visiting nurses. That makes the most sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britt</title>
		<link>http://ddhr.org/2006/06/12/visiting-nurses/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 05:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ddhr.org/2006/06/12/visiting-nurses/#comment-532</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to go with Mike on this one, although my guess is that they also thought they were making a joke by making it sound like 90-year-old nurses.&#160; Spectacularly poorly phrased, though.

But my real point is to say, I miss Cliff&#039;s.&#160; That&#039;s some good ice cream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm going to go with Mike on this one, although my guess is that they also thought they were making a joke by making it sound like 90-year-old nurses.&nbsp; Spectacularly poorly phrased, though.</p>
<p>But my real point is to say, I miss Cliff's.&nbsp; That's some good ice cream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://ddhr.org/2006/06/12/visiting-nurses/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ddhr.org/2006/06/12/visiting-nurses/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s absolutely not what it means.&#160; And I don&#039;t mind helping their cause.&#160; I&#039;m all for insisting on visiting nurses who are in their 90s when people are in their 90s, or whatever the heck this thing is advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that's absolutely not what it means.&nbsp; And I don't mind helping their cause.&nbsp; I'm all for insisting on visiting nurses who are in their 90s when people are in their 90s, or whatever the heck this thing is advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://ddhr.org/2006/06/12/visiting-nurses/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ddhr.org/2006/06/12/visiting-nurses/#comment-524</guid>
		<description>I think its to insist on nurses in the 90 percentile of client satisfaction....

As far as advertising goes though...they win cause you posted it on your website and are talking about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its to insist on nurses in the 90 percentile of client satisfaction....</p>
<p>As far as advertising goes though...they win cause you posted it on your website and are talking about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

